There were some challenges while changing my research paper into a media presentation. i changed my paper into a powerpoint presentation. It would of been really hard to get all the detail out of my paper just using the presentation but having the voice over really helped me explain what i was trying to say because i didnt want to write to much on the powerpoint to loose a person attention.
My audience didnt really change from the paper to the powerpoint because it was both directed to people that wanted research on domestic violence. there were pictures and talking to help someone more clearly understand what i was explaining but overall it was directed to the same audience.
My resorces in my powerpoint were ore pictures. although my pictures werent describing what i was trying to say it was a better image to tie back my main points that i was talking about on the slides.
Tuesday, March 31, 2015
IMRaD
IMRaD stands for introduction, methods and discussion. both of them relate back to a research topic but just set up and formatteed diferrently. the introduction and results are a little bit the same. both states what your topic is, and also your findings, data, and evidence you found to backup your topic goes in results.
Some things that are different is that in the IMRaD, you are coming up with a hypothesis. it could support or not support your topic. something else is the discussion part. its discussing if you yourself has got the research needed. to make comparisons with other studies. theses paragraphs talk back to what you've been writing about in your paper.
Some things that are different is that in the IMRaD, you are coming up with a hypothesis. it could support or not support your topic. something else is the discussion part. its discussing if you yourself has got the research needed. to make comparisons with other studies. theses paragraphs talk back to what you've been writing about in your paper.
Thursday, March 26, 2015
Monday, March 23, 2015
media blog
In the reading about remediation there are a bunch of different muti media ways to show my paper and we talked about many in class. For mine i have decided to do a power point. its what i see as easiest and clearest way to portray information without getting confused but also involved.
I'm trying to do the voice over now so I'm hoping that works. I'm going to make each slide different so it catches the audiences attention in more of a media type of way then me just reading my paragraphs. I'm also going to add in some pictures with it to show examples of my text to make it seem more realistic.
I'm trying to do the voice over now so I'm hoping that works. I'm going to make each slide different so it catches the audiences attention in more of a media type of way then me just reading my paragraphs. I'm also going to add in some pictures with it to show examples of my text to make it seem more realistic.
Thursday, March 12, 2015
Remeditian
Remeditian is transforming text into media form. like when they make a movie over a book alot of people are reading.
the best way i can make my paper into remediation would be making it a power point. i could have put bullet points of my main arguments i found in the research in the beginning of each slide and then my detail of each paragraph on the rest of the slide. i could also add in pictures to make it more in a media way.
another way is that i could record myself talking about my paper to a audience, i could add in more detail talking out loud and showing examples rather than a paper
the best way i can make my paper into remediation would be making it a power point. i could have put bullet points of my main arguments i found in the research in the beginning of each slide and then my detail of each paragraph on the rest of the slide. i could also add in pictures to make it more in a media way.
another way is that i could record myself talking about my paper to a audience, i could add in more detail talking out loud and showing examples rather than a paper
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
refection #2
This paper was harder for me then the last paper.both papers weren't biased and both had to come from some type of research. i was directing the informational one to a group of kids so my audience was very easy to go off of rather than the basic general field of the research paper. i didn't get to the final draft because we haven't met so i cant touch base on that. i picked the topic domestic violence and narrowed it down to social standards and age. i broke it down with an outline and found things to disagree and not disagree with, i was trying to had in controversy with certain situations, i was looking for a lot on scholarly and non scholarly articles but i was finding just more scholarly then non. without having the peer repose it was more difficult for me to look and see how someone else is set up.
Tuesday, March 3, 2015
outline of paper
add in controversy
Source 1 – agree or disagree
2 – agree and disagree (counter argument)
which states it is in the highest rate.
which states it is in the highest rate.
3- agree
1.men or women are abused more
1.men or women are abused more
4- agree
African Americans or Caucasian
African Americans or Caucasian
5-another disagree- some people were saying some people over react on what domestic violence is. i'm going to add in all aspects
6- agree –
what age is domestic violence
6- agree –
what age is domestic violence
7- agree
the facility that are opened
the facility that are opened
Restate thesis and end with a detailed conclusion
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)